A human wrote this post (hi I’m the problem it’s me!)
Is LinkedIn favouring AI-content from premium subs to increase conversions and AI feature adoption? 🦝
“35% more distribution” — if I’m not mistaken this sounds like an explicit pay-to-play scheme. Well, you’re looking at a freshly minted return-to-trial Premium subscriber. I need eyeballs, it worked!
Last month I made a promise to only post 100% organic human-written, brain-to-eyeballs content on LinkedIn. My content commitment for the age of AI. Have you considered a similar commitment? I’m bullish on authenticity. But what if that authenticity is punished because of the desire to get users to onboard to AI functionality and premium plans, I wonder?
Anyways, now I need to know if AI content is going to be favored over content written by “Kyle Intelligence” and what that means for my next few months, and the next few years of content and monetization for eye-ball industries in general. 👀
Here is that original post and content commitment for the age of AI: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn%3Ali%3Ashare%3A7238588688744472576
In light of this content commitment and my belief that we are entering into a new form of authenticity economy, do I need to start including AI-generated snippets (”only this snippet about AI was generated by AI”) in order to rank, while still satisfying the demands of our algorithmic overlords? 🫠
Just tuning in? 🥟
I’m searching for an ambitious, cross-functional ops role at a Seed — Series A+ startup. To learn more, visit the #huntatscale project page — https://yum.butterystack.com/about/
Want to learn about the hottest SaaS tools to build leverage and scale from startup to Series A and beyond? Check out the Buttery Stack directory 🥞 — https://yum.butterystack.com/home/
